Go
to most recent update
Published
4/15/05 (A
new window will open; close it to return to this report.)
The
following report was published on 10/24/98 and last updated on 9/24/2004.
The
4-Year Cycle in the Stock Market
....A
Special Report by Walter Bressert... Updated from time-to-time since 1982.
The
4-year cycle last bottomed 4/94, topped 10/02,
and has yet to top.
When
and at what price level is the next top due? Find out for yourself...
This report shows you how.
Download
this report in PDF format.
Note:
Clicking on the above link will open a new window. To return to this window,
close it.
The order of the Universe shows in
the thousands of cycles observable in nature and documented by the non-profit
Foundation for the Study of Cycles. It shows in the minute structures
of molecules, atoms, and subatomic particles. It also shows in the ordered
structure of the solar system and, as scientists are now discovering,
in the inter-relationships of galaxies. The smallest particles to the
largest clusters of galaxies follow patterns of recognizable order...
so why not the markets?
Prices move in a manner that
may initially appear to be random movement, but with study show an underlying
order. Cycles, waves, Gann squares, angles, Fibonnacci relationships in
both time and price, and other observable phenomena are reflections of
this underlying order. Unfortunately, we do not know its causes, nor do
we have a solid grasp of the rules. But anyone who studies the markets
with an open mind will see that there is indeed an order to all markets,
especially in the formation of highs and lows, which are the focal points
or high energy levels of a market.
Market cycles are not oscilloscope
exact; they contract, extend and sometimes skip a beat. But cycle tops
and bottoms can be identified with 70-90% probability.
It is fundamentals that move
the markets, but unfortunately the fundamentals are almost always the
most bullish and most tempting at tops, and the most bearish at bottoms.
We do not want to buy tops and sell bottoms, but without a study of the
markets we are often oblivious to when tops and bottoms are being made.
True we do not know all of the rules of the markets, but we do know that
we want to buy bottoms, and sell tops. We also know that using technical
tools and money management, we can rack up sizeable profits by trading
with trend.
Fortunately for us, the energy
of the markets is visible in price movement, which show repeating patterns.
Market oscillators reflect this energy as overbought and oversold levels.
More often than not, these overbought and oversold levels are also cycle
highs and lows. By identifying the lengths of the most powerful and consistent
cycles, called dominant cycles, we can often anticipate tops and bottoms
as well as the direction of the trend, or longer cycle.
The 4-year cycle in the U.S. Stock
Market can be traced back to 1789, and is the dominant longer-term cycle
affecting the stock market, setting trends that often last for three or
more years.
Table A lists the 4-year cycles since
1917, based on the daily close. The column headings are self-explanatory.
The averages at the bottom of the chart show that the 4-year cycle averaged
48 months from low-to-low, 37 months from low-to-high, and 12 months from
high-to-low. The average advance from low-to-high was 107%, or more than
a doubling of the level at which the cycle began.
Table
A
4-Year
Cycle in DJIA 1917 to 2004 (Based on Closing Prices)
Date of
Low Close
1
|
Low
Close
2
|
Date of
High Close
3
|
High
Close
4
|
%Advance
to High
5
|
Month
Low-to-Low
6
|
Month
Low-to-High
7
|
Month
High-to-Low
8
|
1917/12/19
|
66
|
1919/11/03
|
120
|
62
|
44
|
23
|
21
|
1921/08/24
|
64
|
1926/02/11
|
162
|
153
|
55
|
54
|
1
|
1926/03/30
|
135
|
1929/09/03
|
381
|
182
|
44
|
42
|
2
|
1929/11/13
|
199
|
1930/04/17
|
294
|
48
|
32
|
5
|
27
|
1932/07/08
|
41
|
1937/03/10
|
194
|
373
|
68
|
56
|
12
|
1938/03/31
|
99
|
1939/09/12
|
156
|
58
|
49
|
18
|
31
|
1942/04/28
|
93
|
1946/05/26
|
213
|
129
|
54
|
49
|
5
|
1946/10/09
|
163
|
1948/06/15
|
193
|
18
|
32
|
20
|
12
|
1949/06/13
|
162
|
1953/01/05
|
294
|
81
|
51
|
43
|
8
|
1953/09/14
|
256
|
1956/04/06
|
52
|
104
|
49
|
31
|
18
|
1957/10/22
|
420
|
1961/12/13
|
735
|
75
|
56
|
50
|
6
|
1962/06/26
|
536
|
1966/02/09
|
995
|
86
|
52
|
44
|
8
|
1966/10/07
|
744
|
1968/12/03
|
985
|
32
|
43
|
26
|
17
|
1970/05/26
|
631
|
1973/01/11
|
1052
|
67
|
55
|
32
|
23
|
1974/12/06
|
578
|
1976/09/12
|
1015
|
76
|
38
|
21
|
17
|
1978/02/28
|
742
|
1981/04/27
|
1024
|
38
|
54
|
38
|
16
|
1982/08/12
|
777
|
1987/08/25
|
2722
|
250
|
62
|
60
|
2
|
1987/10/19
|
1739
|
1990/07/17
|
3000
|
73
|
36
|
33
|
3
|
1990/10/11
|
2365
|
1994/01/31
|
3978
|
68
|
42
|
39
|
3
|
1994/04/04
|
3593
|
1998/07/17
|
9338
|
160
|
56
|
55
|
1
|
1998/08/31 |
7539
|
2000/01/14
|
11750
|
55
|
52
|
17
|
33
|
|
|
AVERAGES
|
|
105%
|
48
|
36
|
13
|
Averages, however, are not very helpful
in defining a market, so lets look at a market qualifier
those cycles that exceeded the high of the previous 4-year cycle
versus those that did not exceed the high of the previous
4-year cycle. As you can see in Tables B and C on the next page, there
is a distinct difference between those cycles in Table B that exceeded
the high of the previous 4-year cycle and those cycles in Table C that
did not.
Column 3 of both tables shows the
% Advance from the low of the cycle to the high. The average %Advance
in Column 3 of Table C is grossly distorted by the 373% rise from the
1932 depression low. The average advance with this cycle omitted is only
46%, less than half of the 112% rise for those cycles in Table B that
exceeded the previous cycle high.
Table
B
DJIA
Exceeded High of Previous 4-Year Cycle High
Year
Cycle
Low
1
|
Year
Cycle
High
2
|
%
Advance
From Low
3
|
Months
Low-
to-
Low
4
|
Months
Low-
to-
High
5
|
Months
High-to-
Low
6
|
Drop
Below
Prev Low
7
|
% Move
Above
4-Year High
8
|
%
Decline
From High
9
|
%
Retrace-
ment of
Move
L-H
10
|
1921
|
1926
|
153
|
55
|
54
|
1
|
No
|
35
|
17
|
28
|
1926
|
1929
|
182
|
44
|
42
|
2
|
No
|
134
|
48
|
74
|
1942
|
1946
|
129
|
54
|
49
|
5
|
No
|
36
|
23
|
41
|
1949
|
1953
|
81
|
51
|
43
|
18
|
No
|
51
|
17
|
29
|
1953
|
1956
|
104
|
49
|
31
|
6
|
No
|
77
|
19
|
38
|
1957
|
1961
|
75
|
56
|
50
|
8
|
No
|
41
|
27
|
63
|
1962
|
1966
|
86
|
52
|
44
|
23
|
Yes
|
35
|
25
|
55
|
1970
|
1973
|
66
|
55
|
32
|
16
|
No
|
6
|
45
|
113
|
1978
|
1981
|
38
|
54
|
38
|
2
|
No
|
1
|
24
|
88
|
1982
|
1987
|
250
|
62
|
60
|
2
|
No
|
168
|
36
|
51
|
1987
|
1990
|
73
|
38
|
33
|
3
|
No
|
7
|
21
|
50
|
1990
|
1994
|
68
|
42
|
39
|
3
|
No
|
33
|
10
|
24
|
1994
|
1998
|
160
|
56
|
55
|
1
|
No
|
66
|
19
|
33
|
AVERAGE
|
112
|
51
|
44
|
8
|
No
|
66
|
26
|
53
|
Table
C
DJIA
Did Not Exceed High of Previous 4-Year Cycle High
Year
Cycle
Low
1
|
Year
Cycle
High
2
|
%
Advance
From Low
3
|
Months
Low-to-
Low
4
|
Months
Low-to-
High
5
|
Months
High-to-
Low
6
|
Drop
Below
Prev Low
7
|
%
Retrace-ment
to High
8
|
%
Decline
From High
9
|
%
Retrace-
ment of
Move
10
|
1929
|
1930
|
48
|
32
|
5
|
17
|
Yes
|
52
|
86
|
265
|
1932
|
1937
|
373
|
68
|
56
|
12
|
No
|
60
|
49
|
62
|
1938
|
1939
|
58
|
49
|
18
|
31
|
Yes
|
60
|
40
|
111
|
1946
|
1948
|
18
|
32
|
20
|
12
|
Yes
|
60
|
16
|
105
|
1966
|
1968
|
32
|
43
|
26
|
17
|
Yes
|
96
|
36
|
147
|
1974
|
1976
|
76
|
38
|
21
|
17
|
No
|
92
|
37
|
62
|
AVERAGE
|
100
|
43
|
24
|
19
|
|
70
|
44
|
125
|
CALCULATE
4-YEAR CYCLE TOPS AND BOTTOMS
OF THE S&P INDEX
To calculate the next top and
/or bottom of the four year cycle in a bull market (a cycle that exceeds
the high of the previous four year cycle), follow the steps below for
either the DJIA or the S&P Index.
1) To calculate the most probable
time of the cycle top, from the most recent 4 year cycle bottom, calculate
the time period 31 to 50 months from the cycle low, in which 75% of
the highs occurred. (Derived from Table B, Column 5.)
Date Cycle Low
Daily
Close
|
31 to 50 Months
|
Aug '98
|
Mar '01 to Oct '02
|
2) To calculate the most probable
price range for the top of the 4 year cycle, calculate a percent rise
of 66 to 85% from the low close of the cycle. Twelve of 13 years reached
or exceeded 66% as the cycle topped, and six years exceeded 85% rising
103% to 250% a broad range, but one that gives precedence for
a sizeable move to occur. (Derived from Table B, Column 3.)
Price Cycle
Low
Daily
Close
|
Range 66 to 85%
|
103 to 250%
|
957
|
1600 to 1800*
|
1900 to 3400*
|
3) Also calculate the percent rise
above the high close of the previous 4-year cycle top by calculating
a percent rise of 33-51% above it, which was reached by 9 of the 13
cycles, and look for an overlap of the two price levels (from 2 and
3). (Derived from Table B, Column 8.)
Price Cycle
High
Daily
Close
|
Range 33 to 51%
|
Overlap Range
|
1182
|
1600 to 1800*
|
1600 to 1800*
|
4) Calculate the bottom...
To calculate the expected time period for the next 4-year cycle to bottom,
from the most recent cycle bottom calculate 38 to 56 months, the time
period in which 12 of the 13 cycles bottomed. (Derived from Table B,
Column 4.)
Date Cycle Bottom
Daily
Close
|
Time Range From Bottom of 38 56 Months
|
Aug '98
|
Oct '01 to Apr '03
|
Also,
the cycle bottom is most likely to occur 1 to 8 months from the cycle
top, which occurred in 10 of 13 cycles. (Derived from Table B, Column
6.)
Date Cycle Top
Daily
Close
|
Range 1 to 8 Months
|
|
|
5)To calculate the most probable
price range for the cycle bottom, calculate a 10%, or 17-36% decline
from the high close of the cycle, which occurred in 11 of the 13 cycles.(Derived
from Table B, Column 9.)
Cycle High
Daily
Close
|
10% (Once)
|
17 to 36%
|
|
|
|
6) Also calculate the % retracements
of 24 to 63%, which occurred in 10 of the 13 cycles. The remaining three
cycles retraced 74%, 88%, and 113%. Next, calculate the range by subtracting
the low close from the high close.
Cycle Low
Daily
Close
|
Cycle High
Daily
Close
|
Range (H-L)
|
|
|
|
Then, multiply the range by 24%
and 63% and subtract each from the high to get the retracement objective.
Watch for the cycle to bottom in this price retracement objective, overlapping
with the objective in 5. (Derived from Table B, Column 10).
Range
|
24 to 63%
|
74, 88, 113%
|
|
|
|
If prices drop lower, multiply
the range by 74, 88 and 113% and subtract each from the high to get
the lowest retracement objective. (Derived from Table B, Column 10).
What about a Bear Market, in which
the low of the previous 4-year cycle is taken out?
A close below 64% would
indicate the previous cycle bottom is likely to be taken out either as
the current 4-year cycle bottoms, or the next 4-year cycle bottoms. However,
a close below 64% is most likely to occur after prices fail
to exceed the high of the previous 4-year cycle, which is not
the pattern for the current cycle. This pattern of failure to exceed the
previous top followed by a decline below the previous 4-year cycle bottom
occurred following the 1929 top. Table C shows that there was only a five
month rise to the next 4-year cycle top, which retraced 52% before tanking
into the 1932 bottom.
CALCULATE
4-YEAR CYCLE TOPS AND BOTTOMS
OF THE DJIA INDEX
To calculate the next top and/or
bottom of the 4-year cycle in a bull market (a cycle that exceeds the
high of the previous 4-year cycle), follow the steps below for the DJIA
Index.
1) To calculate the most probable
time of the cycle top, from the most recent 4-year cycle bottom calculate
the time period 31 to 50 months from the cycle low in which 75% of the
highs occurred. (Derived from Table B, Column 5.)
Date Cycle Low
Daily Close
|
31 to 50 Months
|
Aug '98
|
Mar '01 to Oct '02
|
2) To calculate
the most probable price range for the top of the 4-year cycle calculate
a percent rise of 66 to 85% from the low close of the cycle. Twelve
of 13 years reached or exceeded 66% as the cycle topped and six years
exceeded 85% rising 103% to 250% a broad range, but one that
provides precedence for a sizeable move to occur. (Derived from Table
B, Column 3.)
Price Cycle
Low
Daily Close
|
Range 66 to 85%
|
103
to 250%
|
7539
|
12,500* to 14,000*
|
15,300*
to 26,400*
|
3) Also
calculate the percent rise above the high close of the previous 4-year
cycle top by calculating a percent rise of 33-51% above it, which was
reached by 9 of the 13 cycles, and look for an overlap of the two price
levels (from 2 and 3). (Derived from Table B, Column 8.)
Price Cycle
High
Daily
Close
|
Range 33 to 51%
|
Overlap Range
|
9338
|
12,400* to 14,100*
|
12,500* to 14,00*
|
4) Calculate
the bottom... To calculate the expected time period for the next
4-year cycle to bottom, from the most recent cycle bottom calculate
38 to 56 months, the time period in which 12 of the 13 cycles bottomed.
(Derived from Table B, Column 4.)
Date Cycle Bottom
Daily
Close
|
Time Range From Bottom of 38 to 56 Months
|
Aug '98
|
Oct '01 to Apr '03
|
Also, the
cycle bottom is most likely to occur 1 to 8 months from the cycle top,
which occurred in 10 of 13 cycles. (Derived from Table B, Column 6.)
Date Cycle Top
Daily Close
|
Range 1-8 Months
|
|
|
5) To calculate the most probable
price range for the cycle bottom, calculate a 10%, or 17-36% decline
from the high close of the cycle, which occurred in 11 of the 13 cycles.
(Derived from Table B, Column 9.)
Cycle High Daily
Close
|
10% (Once)
|
17-36%
|
|
|
|
6) Also calculate the % retracements
of 24 to 63% or 50 - 63%, which occurred in 10 of the 13 cycles. The
remaining three cycles retraced 74%, 88% and 113%. Next, calculate the
range by subtracting the low close from the high close.
Cycle Low Close
Daily
Close
|
Cycle High Close
|
Range (H-L)
|
|
|
|
Then, multiply the range by 24%
and 63% and subtract each from the high to get the retracement objective.
Watch for the cycle to bottom in this price retracement objective, overlapping
with the objective in 5. (Derived from Table B, Column 10).
Range
|
24 to 63%
|
74, 88, 113%
|
|
|
|
If prices drop lower, multiply
the range by 74, 88 and 113% and subtract each from the high to get
the lowest retracement objective. (Derived from Table B, Column 10).
What about a Bear
Market, in which the low of the previous 4-Year Cycle is taken out?
A close below 64% would indicate
the previous cycle bottom is likely to be taken out either as the current
4-year cycle bottoms, or the next 4-year cycle bottoms. However, a close
below 64% is most likely to occur after prices fail to exceed
the high of the previous 4-year cycle, which is not the pattern
for the current cycle. This pattern of failure to exceed the previous
top followed by a decline below the previous 4-year cycle bottom occurred
following the 1929 top. Table C shows that there is only a five-month
rise to the next 4-year cycle top, which retraced 52%.
____________________
*Rounded to the nearest 100.
View more recent updates:
(A
new window will open; close it to return to this report.)
Return to the Top
There
is a risk of loss in trading futures.
Copyright
©1982-2005 Walter Bressert, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
|